AI Pentesting for Continuous Security Validation. Test Your Entire Attack Surface. Validate Real Risk. AI finds more vulnerabilities. Human experts prove what actually matters.

Most organizations test only a fraction of their attack surface. Sara AI Pentesting expands coverage across your environment, while the Synack Red Team validates real, exploitable risk. Together, they deliver continuous security validation—not periodic testing.

You're Pentesting a Fraction of Your Environment. Attackers Aren't.

Synack platform Asset List dashboard showing 100 assets across IPs, FQDNs, and applications, with columns for IP address, open ports, cloud provider, exploitable and suspected vulnerability severity scores, and last scan and test statuses.

From Periodic Testing to Continuous Security Validation

Introducing Sara AI Pentesting

Sara
AI Pentesting

Expands coverage across your attack surface with speed and scale

Synack Red Team

Validates real, exploitable vulnerabilities through real-world penetration testing

Synack Platform

Combines both to deliver continuous, trusted security outcomes

Why Traditional Pentesting Falls Short

Built for Modern Security Teams

 

See Sara AI Pentesting in Practice

Organizations like Paramount are already expanding their security coverage using AI pentesting combined with human validation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Close
What is AI Pentesting?

AI pentesting uses artificial intelligence to autonomously discover vulnerabilities across an organization’s attack surface. Unlike traditional pentesting, it scales continuously and tests far more of the environment than manual approaches can cover.

Close
How does AI pentesting differ from traditional penetration testing?

Traditional pentesting is limited in scope and runs once or twice a year. AI pentesting expands coverage continuously, identifies vulnerabilities at scale, and adapts to environments that change weekly.

Close
How does AI expand attack surface coverage?

AI agents continuously explore assets across cloud infrastructure, SaaS applications, APIs, and internal systems — testing far more of the environment than human pentesters can reach in a fixed engagement.

Close
How does human validation reduce false positives in pentesting?

AI surfaces a large volume of potential vulnerabilities, but not all are exploitable in the real world. Human experts on the Synack Red Team validate each finding to confirm real, exploitable risk — so security teams act on signal, not noise.

Close
What is continuous security validation?

Continuous security validation is the ongoing process of testing, validating, and improving security posture in real time, rather than relying on point-in-time assessments. It pairs continuous discovery with continuous validation to keep pace with how environments — and attackers — actually move.

Close
What is agentic AI in the context of penetration testing?

Agentic AI refers to autonomous systems designed to take initiative and achieve complex security goals with minimal human intervention. Unlike static scanners, agentic AI like Sara uses specialized agents to validate vulnerabilities by emulating real attacker behavior—executing. Prioritizing, or abandoning actions based on real-time analysis of the target’s responses.

Close
How does automated AI pentesting differ from a traditional vulnerability scan?

While a vulnerability scan identifies potential risks from a known list, AI pentesting (like Sara Triage) goes further by actively adjudicating findings to determine if they are truly exploitable. Sara automates the testing phase. This allows vulnerabilities to be identified much faster than manual human testing, while still maintaining human review at the end for final validation.

Close
What LLMs do Synack’s AI features leverage?

Synack uses GCP Vertex AI to leverage Google Gemini (to summarize scoping information in the Synack Assessment Creation Wizard) and Anthropic Claude (for Sara services).

Close
Do the LLMs Synack leverages train on or retain customer data?

No. The underlying LLMs used to power Sara and other AI features and services do not retain or train on any Synack customer data. Synack maintains full control over where data is processed and stored at rest.

Close
Does Synack train Sara or any other AI feature or service on customer data?

No, Synack does not use customer data for training AI features or services at this time.

Close
What safety guardrails are in place to prevent service impact?

Sara operates within a Layered Validation Architecture to ensure all actions stay within approved scopes. Some key safety functions include:

  • Destructive Command Blocking: The filter proactively identifies and drops commands across nine infrastructure categories that could cause service disruption, such as mass deletion of databases or virtual machines.
  • Strict Scope Enforcement: Sara is technically bounded to stay within your approved IP ranges and web applications. With built-in processes that prevent unauthorized lateral movement.
  • Rules of Engagement (RoE) Compliance: The system automatically enforces a strict RoE that prohibits intentional Denial of Service (DoS) testing, password brute-forcing, uncontrolled post-exploitation activities, or interaction with third-party services.
Close
Can automated AI pentesting handle complex authentication like MFA or Captcha?

Currently, bypassing Captcha remains a challenge as it is specifically designed to detect bots; testing is best performed on targets without it. Support for MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication) and OTP (One-Time Passwords) is not available now, but is on the roadmap.

Close
What types of vulnerabilities can Sara AI detect and validate?

Sara tests for a wide range of web and host vulnerabilities, including but not limited to:

  • Web: SQL Injection (SQLi), Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), IDOR, SSRF, and Command Injection.
  • Host: Weaknesses in protocols like SSH, FTP, SMTP, and SMB, including known exploits like EternalBlue.
  • CVE-Based: Mapping and validating specific vulnerabilities against the latest intelligence sources.
Close
How does the Sara stay updated on new and novel vulnerabilities?

In addition to open source vulnerability intelligence, Synack sources vulnerability intelligence from a third-party provider, ensuring the agent has the necessary context for the latest Proof of Concepts (POCs) and CVE information. Performance is further maintained by testing agents against internal benchmarks to prevent “drift” when underlying LLM models are updated.

Close
Can Sara be used to test internal environments?

Currently Sara can only test external web and host assets. Testing of internal assets is on the roadmap.

Close
What is AI Pentesting?

AI pentesting uses artificial intelligence to autonomously discover vulnerabilities across an organization’s attack surface. Unlike traditional pentesting, it scales continuously and tests far more of the environment than manual approaches can cover.

Close
How does AI pentesting differ from traditional penetration testing?

Traditional pentesting is limited in scope and runs once or twice a year. AI pentesting expands coverage continuously, identifies vulnerabilities at scale, and adapts to environments that change weekly.

Close
How does AI expand attack surface coverage?

AI agents continuously explore assets across cloud infrastructure, SaaS applications, APIs, and internal systems — testing far more of the environment than human pentesters can reach in a fixed engagement.

Close
How does human validation reduce false positives in pentesting?

AI surfaces a large volume of potential vulnerabilities, but not all are exploitable in the real world. Human experts on the Synack Red Team validate each finding to confirm real, exploitable risk — so security teams act on signal, not noise.

Close
What is continuous security validation?

Continuous security validation is the ongoing process of testing, validating, and improving security posture in real time, rather than relying on point-in-time assessments. It pairs continuous discovery with continuous validation to keep pace with how environments — and attackers — actually move.

Close
What is agentic AI in the context of penetration testing?

Agentic AI refers to autonomous systems designed to take initiative and achieve complex security goals with minimal human intervention. Unlike static scanners, agentic AI like Sara uses specialized agents to validate vulnerabilities by emulating real attacker behavior—executing. Prioritizing, or abandoning actions based on real-time analysis of the target’s responses.

Close
How does automated AI pentesting differ from a traditional vulnerability scan?

While a vulnerability scan identifies potential risks from a known list, AI pentesting (like Sara Triage) goes further by actively adjudicating findings to determine if they are truly exploitable. Sara automates the testing phase. This allows vulnerabilities to be identified much faster than manual human testing, while still maintaining human review at the end for final validation.

Close
What LLMs do Synack’s AI features leverage?

Synack uses GCP Vertex AI to leverage Google Gemini (to summarize scoping information in the Synack Assessment Creation Wizard) and Anthropic Claude (for Sara services).

Close
Do the LLMs Synack leverages train on or retain customer data?

No. The underlying LLMs used to power Sara and other AI features and services do not retain or train on any Synack customer data. Synack maintains full control over where data is processed and stored at rest.

Close
Does Synack train Sara or any other AI feature or service on customer data?

No, Synack does not use customer data for training AI features or services at this time.

Close
What safety guardrails are in place to prevent service impact?

Sara operates within a Layered Validation Architecture to ensure all actions stay within approved scopes. Some key safety functions include:

  • Destructive Command Blocking: The filter proactively identifies and drops commands across nine infrastructure categories that could cause service disruption, such as mass deletion of databases or virtual machines.
  • Strict Scope Enforcement: Sara is technically bounded to stay within your approved IP ranges and web applications. With built-in processes that prevent unauthorized lateral movement.
  • Rules of Engagement (RoE) Compliance: The system automatically enforces a strict RoE that prohibits intentional Denial of Service (DoS) testing, password brute-forcing, uncontrolled post-exploitation activities, or interaction with third-party services.
Close
Can automated AI pentesting handle complex authentication like MFA or Captcha?

Currently, bypassing Captcha remains a challenge as it is specifically designed to detect bots; testing is best performed on targets without it. Support for MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication) and OTP (One-Time Passwords) is not available now, but is on the roadmap.

Close
What types of vulnerabilities can Sara AI detect and validate?

Sara tests for a wide range of web and host vulnerabilities, including but not limited to:

  • Web: SQL Injection (SQLi), Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), IDOR, SSRF, and Command Injection.
  • Host: Weaknesses in protocols like SSH, FTP, SMTP, and SMB, including known exploits like EternalBlue.
  • CVE-Based: Mapping and validating specific vulnerabilities against the latest intelligence sources.
Close
How does the Sara stay updated on new and novel vulnerabilities?

In addition to open source vulnerability intelligence, Synack sources vulnerability intelligence from a third-party provider, ensuring the agent has the necessary context for the latest Proof of Concepts (POCs) and CVE information. Performance is further maintained by testing agents against internal benchmarks to prevent “drift” when underlying LLM models are updated.

Close
Can Sara be used to test internal environments?

Currently Sara can only test external web and host assets. Testing of internal assets is on the roadmap.